2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 1990 Volvo 960
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1990 Volvo 960. (204 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1990 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 361 kg more than 1990 Volvo 960. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Volvo 960. (267 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Volvo 960.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Mountaineer | 1990 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Mountaineer | 960 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 204 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 267 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1917 kg | 1556 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 80 L |