2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura CL would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 337 kg more than 2002 Acura CL.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura CL. (315 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura CL.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Mountaineer | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Mercury | Acura |
Model | Mountaineer | CL |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4013 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 260 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 315 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1917 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 65 L |