2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 201 kg more than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Mountaineer | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mercury | Jeep |
Model | Mountaineer | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 312 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1917 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |