2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 92 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 543 kg more than 2004 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Mountaineer | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mercury | Rover |
Model | Mountaineer | 75 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4013 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1917 kg | 1374 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 65 L |