2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2009 Volvo C70

To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 3,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (202 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer.

Because 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (339 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C70. (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C70. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer has automatic transmission and 2009 Volvo C70 has manual transmission. 2009 Volvo C70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mercury Mountaineer 2009 Volvo C70
Make Mercury Volvo
Model Mountaineer C70
Year Released 2005 2009
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3996 cc 2521 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 202 HP 224 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 236 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1500 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1840 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 12.5 L/100km 9.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 15.8 L/100km 13.1 L/100km