2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2010 Citroen C1
To start off, 2010 Citroen C1 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 143 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C1. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 445 kg more than 2010 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C1. (93 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Mountaineer | 2010 Citroen C1 | |
Make | Mercury | Citroen |
Model | Mountaineer | C1 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4013 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 93 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 23.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1917 kg | 1472 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 35 L |