2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2010 Scion tC. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2010 Scion tC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 599 kg more than 2010 Scion tC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Scion tC. (219 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Scion tC.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Mountaineer | 2010 Scion tC | |
Make | Mercury | Scion |
Model | Mountaineer | tC |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 219 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1917 kg | 1318 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 55 L |