2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 210 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (430 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (345 Nm). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Mountaineer | 2011 Audi R8 | |
Make | Mercury | Audi |
Model | Mountaineer | R8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 345 Nm | 430 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 90 L |