2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2012 Buick Regal

To start off, 2012 Buick Regal is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (239 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2012 Buick Regal. (182 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2012 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 376 kg more than 2012 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Buick Regal. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (382 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Buick Regal. (233 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Buick Regal.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mercury Mountaineer 2012 Buick Regal
Make Mercury Buick
Model Mountaineer Regal
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4605 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 239 HP 182 HP
Torque 382 Nm 233 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2009 kg 1633 kg
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4831 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1857 mm
Vehicle Height 1850 mm 1483 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2738 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 13.1 L/100km 7.6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 16.8 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]