2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2012 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2012 Volkswagen Golf. (140 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2012 Volkswagen Golf. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 559 kg more than 2012 Volkswagen Golf. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volkswagen Golf. (320 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volkswagen Golf.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Mountaineer | 2012 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | Mercury | Volkswagen |
Model | Mountaineer | Golf |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 140 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 320 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1917 kg | 1358 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4199 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 55 L |