2005 Mercury Sable vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (201 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 146 kg more than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Because 1951 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercury Sable | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Mercury | Talbot |
| Model | Sable | Baby |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 2964 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3130 mm |
