2005 Mercury Sable vs. 1958 MG MGA
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 MG MGA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 MG MGA would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (153 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1958 MG MGA. (71 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1958 MG MGA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 613 kg more than 1958 MG MGA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (252 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 MG MGA. (104 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 MG MGA.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Sable | 1958 MG MGA | |
Make | Mercury | MG |
Model | Sable | MGA |
Year Released | 2005 | 1958 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 71 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 104 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |