2005 Mercury Sable vs. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 593 kg more than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercury Sable | 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Mercury | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Sable | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 2106 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 109 L |
