2005 Mercury Sable vs. 1997 Reliant Scimitar
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (153 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1997 Reliant Scimitar. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1997 Reliant Scimitar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 620 kg more than 1997 Reliant Scimitar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (252 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Reliant Scimitar. (127 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Reliant Scimitar.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Sable | 1997 Reliant Scimitar | |
Make | Mercury | Reliant |
Model | Sable | Scimitar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 127 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 893 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2140 mm |