2005 Mercury Sable vs. 2000 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 284 kg more than 2000 Toyota Crown.
Because 2000 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercury Sable | 2000 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Mercury | Toyota |
| Model | Sable | Crown |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2964 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
