2005 Mercury Sable vs. 2001 Suzuki SX
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki SX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki SX would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (154 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki SX. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki SX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 35 kg more than 2001 Suzuki SX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercury Sable | 2001 Suzuki SX | |
| Make | Mercury | Suzuki |
| Model | Sable | SX |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1298 cc |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 126 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1571 kg | 1536 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2460 mm |
