2005 Mercury Sable vs. 2002 Proton 300
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (201 HP) has 126 more horse power than 2002 Proton 300. (75 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 469 kg more than 2002 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (281 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton 300. (108 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercury Sable | 2002 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Mercury | Proton |
| Model | Sable | 300 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 75 HP |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2450 mm |
