2005 Mercury Sable vs. 2005 Subaru Forester
To start off, both 2005 Mercury Sable and 2005 Subaru Forester were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Subaru Forester (210 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Sable. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 50 kg more than 2005 Subaru Forester.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Subaru Forester (319 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Sable. (252 Nm). This means 2005 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Sable | 2005 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Mercury | Subaru |
Model | Sable | Forester |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2456 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 1463 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |