2005 Mercury Sable vs. 2009 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2009 Nissan Titan is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Titan (317 HP) has 164 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Sable. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Titan (522 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Sable. (252 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Sable | 2009 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Mercury | Nissan |
Model | Sable | Titan |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 317 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 106 L |