2005 Mercury Sable vs. 2010 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Stilo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (153 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Stilo. (102 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 103 kg more than 2010 Fiat Stilo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (252 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Stilo. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Sable | 2010 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Mercury | Fiat |
Model | Sable | Stilo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |