2005 MG TF vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2005 MG TF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 650 kg more than 2005 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MG TF | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | MG | Mitsubishi |
Model | TF | Challenger |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2730 mm |