2005 MG ZR vs. 2003 Toyota Condor

To start off, 2005 MG ZR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Condor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Condor would be higher. At 2,438 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MG ZR (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 512 kg more than 2005 MG ZR.

Because 2003 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MG ZR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Condor (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MG ZR. (177 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MG ZR.

Compare all specifications:

2005 MG ZR 2003 Toyota Condor
Make MG Toyota
Model ZR Condor
Year Released 2005 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 2438 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 6900 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 177 Nm 195 Nm
Torque RPM 4700 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 95 mm
Engine Stroke Size 89.3 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 8.8:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1120 kg 1632 kg
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 70 L