2005 MG ZR vs. 2010 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2010 Jeep Patriot is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MG ZR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MG ZR would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 158 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Patriot (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MG ZR. (177 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Patriot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MG ZR | 2010 Jeep Patriot | |
Make | MG | Jeep |
Model | ZR | Patriot |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 51 L |