2005 MG ZR vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MG ZR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MG ZR would be higher. At 1,395 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 MG ZR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ecosport (118 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2005 MG ZR. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2005 MG ZR.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Ecosport (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MG ZR. (123 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Ecosport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MG ZR | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | MG | Ford |
Model | ZR | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |