2005 MG ZT-T vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 MG ZT-T is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MG ZT-T (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MG ZT-T weights approximately 865 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MG ZT-T (250 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MG ZT-T | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | MG | Suzuki |
Model | ZT-T | Fronte |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 115 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 66 L |