2005 MG ZT-T vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2005 MG ZT-T is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2005 MG ZT-T. (187 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2005 MG ZT-T.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MG ZT-T (250 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2005 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 2005 MG ZT-T has manual transmission. 2005 MG ZT-T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MG ZT-T | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | MG | Mitsubishi |
Model | ZT-T | FTO |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |