2005 MG ZT vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2005 MG ZT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (180 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2005 MG ZT. (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2005 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 301 kg more than 2005 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (274 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MG ZT. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MG ZT | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | ZT | Frontier |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3278 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 274 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 73 L |