2005 MG ZT vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MG ZT would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MG ZT (175 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MG ZT (240 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 2005 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze. 2005 MG ZT has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Cruze has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Cruze will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 MG ZT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MG ZT | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | MG | Holden |
Model | ZT | Cruze |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 153 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2685 mm |