2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 320 kg more than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Studebaker |
| Model | Colt | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2779 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1300 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2980 mm |
