2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,493 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (94 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 310 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (213 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
| Model | Colt | Herald |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 29 L |
