2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1963 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 690 kg more than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volkswagen |
| Model | Colt | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1493 cc |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 930 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 40 L |
