2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Suzuki |
Model | Colt | Fronte |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 500 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 66 L |