2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1967 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Pontiac Firebird would be higher.
Because 1967 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 1967 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
Model | Colt | Firebird |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 165 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |