2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1969 NSU 1000
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1969 NSU 1000. (64 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1969 NSU 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 940 kg more than 1969 NSU 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 NSU 1000. (90 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 1969 NSU 1000 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | NSU |
| Model | Colt | 1000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1177 cc |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 255 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 680 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 37 L |
