2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1978 Volvo 164
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 164.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 1978 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Colt | 164 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2998 cc |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 255 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 3350 mm |
