2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Colt | 66 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 56 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
