2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 316 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
Model | Colt | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1332 cc | 2568 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2680 mm |