2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1982 Nissan Leopard
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Leopard. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Leopard. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 515 kg more than 1982 Nissan Leopard. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Leopard. (148 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Leopard.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 1982 Nissan Leopard | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Colt | Leopard |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1770 cc |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1105 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2630 mm |