2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2002 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Subaru Outback would be higher.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 2002 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Subaru |
Model | Colt | Outback |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |