2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2003 Subaru Baja
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru Baja. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru Baja would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2003 Subaru Baja. (164 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru Baja. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 40 kg more than 2003 Subaru Baja. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru Baja is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Baja will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru Baja. (225 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru Baja.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 2003 Subaru Baja | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Subaru |
Model | Colt | Baja |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2457 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1580 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2660 mm |