2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Spyker C8 would be higher.
Because 2004 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Spyker |
Model | Colt | C8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |