2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2009 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2009 Renault Trafic is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2009 Renault Trafic. (100 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Trafic.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Trafic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Trafic. (241 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Trafic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 2009 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Colt | Trafic |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1870 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 90 L |