2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 GMC Savana
To start off, 2010 GMC Savana is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher.
Because 2010 GMC Savana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 GMC Savana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 GMC Savana | |
Make | Mitsubishi | GMC |
Model | Colt | Savana |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 323 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |