2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,332 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet (99 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Aston Martin |
Model | Colt | Cygnet |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1332 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.8 L/100km | 4 L/100km |