2005 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 1976 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Datsun 280Z weights approximately 30 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Datsun 280Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1976 Datsun 280Z has automatic transmission and 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo has manual transmission. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Datsun 280Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | 1976 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Datsun |
Model | Dingo | 280Z |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1300 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2304 mm |