2005 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 1989 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 330 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Pontiac Bonneville. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Pontiac Bonneville has automatic transmission and 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo has manual transmission. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Pontiac Bonneville will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | 1989 Pontiac Bonneville | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
Model | Dingo | Bonneville |
Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1300 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2820 mm |