2005 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 1993 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,833 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 55 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Plymouth Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | 1993 Plymouth Colt | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Plymouth |
Model | Dingo | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1300 cc | 1833 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 111 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2530 mm |