2005 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 2000 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda CR-V weights approximately 330 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda CR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo has manual transmission. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | 2000 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Honda |
Model | Dingo | CR-V |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1300 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1745 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2620 mm |