2005 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Smart ForFour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Smart ForFour would be higher. At 1,332 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo weights approximately 200 kg more than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Smart ForFour. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Smart |
| Model | Dingo | ForFour |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1300 cc | 1332 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2510 mm |
