2005 Mitsubishi Dingo vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo has manual transmission. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
| Model | Dingo | Malibu |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1300 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2852 mm |
